Women Face Execution Any Day Now: Sakineh, Maryam, Kobra, and Azar 
Source: Rooz Online: August 12. 2010
 In an interview with Rooz Online, Javid Kian, the lawyer for the four  women who received stoning sentences, has asked international  organizations to act in order to save the lives of 
Sakineh Mohammadi  Ashtiani, 
Maryam Ghorbanzadeh, 
Kobra Babaei, and 
Azar Bagheri.
Meanwhile, on the Wednesday night episode of the Iran state television program 20/30, 
Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani [falsely] confessed to adultery and the murder of her husband. She also made [false] confessions against herself and her lawyer Mohammad Mostafaei.
Javid Kian is the lawyer who along with Mohammad Mostafaei represents  the Ashtiani case. In an interview with Rooz, Kian talked of the  pressures put on Sakineh’s children and said that the televised  confession came only after Sakineh was severely beaten and physically  assaulted.
Mohammad Mostafaei, referring to the confession,  said that the  Judiciary system should know that it cannot justify its behaviour and  conduct through violence, force, extracting false confessions, and  targeting and ruining the character and reputation of others.
The Beating of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani
Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani was  shown on television confessing against herself and her lawyer while her  case and her fate is still in a cloud of obscurity in the wake of the  halt of her stoning sentence. After the confessions of his client was  aired, Javid Kian told Rooz, 
“They took Ms. Ashtiani to room 37 of  Tabriz prison and had her confess against herself. However, these  confessions were not extracted under normal circumstances. Based on the  information I have, Ms. Ashtiani was beaten severely and was forced to  take part in the interview.  They also filmed family members of Ms.  Ashtiani making statements against her. ”He added, “They approached Ms. Ashtiani’s extremely religious family  members and filmed them stating that Sakineh committed adultery and must  be punished. Unfortunately, Ms. Ashtiani’s family members have put  pressure on her children and said to them, ‘Your mother has ruined the  reputation of our family and has to be executed and stoned.’  There is a  lot of psychological pressure on the children.”
  
Javid Kian also explains that he was informed through his other  clients [detained] in the women’s ward of Tabriz prison that Sakineh was  forced to confess in a televised interview under duress and [after  receiving] extreme beatings.
Kian said the following on the latest developments in the Ashtiani  case: “Our last action was to demand a re-opening and retrial of the  case. They were supposed to reply in 20 days, but then the whole  situation with my dear colleague Mr. Mostafaei occurred. After that, the  case of Ms. Ashtiani was suspended by the Judiciary’ s Intelligence and  Security. After Mr. Hosseyni Nobakhti, the executive vice-director of  the Tabriz Execution of Sentences office, wrote to Mr. Ezhey, Iran’s  General Attorney, Mr. Ezhei passed the case to his principle assistant  Saeed Mortazavi.  In turn, Mortazavi sent the case to the Judiciary’s  Intelligence and Security. He added a note under the letter that the  case of Ms. Ghorbanzadeh will be resolved before the case of Ms.  Ashtiani.  However, these two cases have no connection to one another.  
This  indicates that the life of Maryam Ghorbanzadeh is in danger and they  want to execute her as quickly as possible while global attention is  focused on Sakineh’s case.”
Mohammad Mostafaei’s Reaction to the Televised Confession 
Mohammad Mostafaei told Rooz, “Everyone knows that when the life of a  person is in danger, or when (s)he faces death or a stoning sentence,  (s)he would have no choice but to sit behind any camera and accept the  demands of those who have the control of his/her life. (S)he would say  whatever they want to be said. I am certain that this was the case in  Sakineh’s confessions. I have to say, however, that the question of  murder in Sakineh’s case does not hold at all because the murder was one  case and the stoning was another case [in court]. What is important is  that when the family of the victim consent to forgive and spare the life  the defendant, execution and Qesas (eye-for-an-eye execution) are out  of the question, and this has nothing to do with the type and form of  the murder. So, while the question of murder has been resolved, it is  highlighted on television to justify the [illegal] actions. Why wasn’t  the stoning sentence discussed [on television]? Why didn’t they announce  that Sakineh requested a pardon three times, but each time it was  turned down? 
Why didn’t they mention the fact that two out of  the five judges voted not-guilty [to her sentence] due to a lack of  evidence in the adultery charge?”
Mostafaei added, “We argued that a human being is in danger of being  stoned and there was no [option] of death [by hanging]. The head of the  Tabriz Judiciary, after international attention was gained on the case,  said in an interview that the sentence was death by hanging. However,  this is not true.  Why didn’t they interview her lawyer on television?  They claim that I have never met Sakineh, even though I am her lawyer. I  have talked to her on the phone many times and I have met her [in  person] many times. I am officially representing her, and this is  mentioned in the case too. I don’t know what they are trying to prove.   If the Judiciary had accepted the demand for pardon, there would not  have been so much protest and tumult over the case. The government and  judiciary officials should know that they cannot achieve anything by  resorting to violence, force, deception, and lies. I do not care what  Israel or the USA does or says. My concern is to save the life of a  human being from death. In the midst of all this, some people living  outside Iran take political advantage of the situation, while others are  working in a completely humane and sincere way. I do not deal with  those who are taking advantage. I feel sorry for my country. I wish  instead of making false documentaries, the officials would choose the  correct approaches that would serve the best interests of the country,  Islam, and the regime.”